What are we discussing? Behind the readings you have done or not done Correa is the kind of socialism that is being advocated. It is a sin against humanity not to have read Marx, or not read it as it wished, but it is, how can I say? Something strange to talk about dialectical materialism and historical materialism without reference to Marx and Marxism. Or, as is done with a reference bit strange. The class struggle is not a deviant behavior of a group of desperate, is the result of a society divided into antagonistic classes, and only disappear when classes disappear. Not understanding this is a mistake, and not just theoretical. The proof is (for example) in the same row today unleashed the bankers and the right ... withCorrea's government work (or perhaps it is thought that class struggle is only when it is carrying out struggles of workers and the people?).
"progressing new times." How well: moving without class struggle? Advance new concepts. Perfect: What we propose instead of the old concept of "social classes"? Or is that social classes no longer exist because the stones of the Berlin Wall fell on the heads of some who were left and others were not so? Or does the 21 century society is not divided into classes? Or is that classes have stopped fighting? With criteria like this, every time we go with the news that things are "inciting class struggle" (as we say certain rightsdarts thrown at the vanguard doubters are misguided, and end up not discuss with anyone. And walk in need of discussion, if you want to give the "21st century socialism" a living that is not purely ideological. And I do not think it's a matter of delicacies theoretical, but practical ways that are assuming the proposals and utopian horizons of roads being built, finally, if "socialism" is so much to Lula as Lagos and Bachelet, the Evo and Chavez, as Zapatero and Blair finally says nothing.
Regards, Mario Mario Unda
Research Center Quito
CITY
0 comments:
Post a Comment